Grav Web Hosting Comparison UK
You are looking for the perfect Grav web hosting for your online project? Here you will find special hosting offers that are optimized for running the Grav CMS:
hosttest recommends a minimum price for these products. In our opinion, this is very important for the provider and for you as a customer, so that you also receive good services in the long term. If you still want to see all offers despite our recommendation, please click here.
Storage Space
Rating
Storage Space
Rating
Now post an individual tender for free & without obligation and receive offers in the shortest possible time.
Start tenderGrav Hosting Providers - Comparison
A Grav hosting is a tailored hosting solution, perfect for using Grav as a Content Management System.
What is Grav?
Grav is a modern file-based Content Management System (CMS). This type of lightweight CMS is also known as a Flat CMS.
Unlike many other CMS platforms like WordPress or Joomla that use a database, Grav stores content in simple text files. This makes Grav particularly efficient in terms of performance, speed, installation, and maintenance.
Some key features and benefits of Grav include:
- File-based System: Grav does not require a database. All content and configurations are stored in flat, simple text files, making it easier to back up, migrate, and manage the website.
- Speed and Performance: Due to its database-free and lean architecture, Grav is often faster than database-driven CMS.
- Flexibility: Grav supports Markdown for content creation, allows easy design customization through themes, and offers a variety of plugins for advanced functionalities.
- Easy Management: With an intuitive and user-friendly admin interface, content management in Grav is straightforward.
- Security: The absence of a database reduces potential security risks often associated with SQL injection attacks.
- Open Source: Grav is open-source software, meaning it can be used and modified for free.
Grav is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized websites, blogs, and portfolios where users seek a fast, flexible, and easy-to-use CMS. As it is less widespread than other CMS, there are generally fewer resources and community support available compared to more popular systems like WordPress.
What to Consider in a Hosting for Grav?
When choosing a hosting service for Grav, certain factors should be considered to ensure smooth and efficient website functionality: Grav is written in PHP, so it's important that the hosting service supports the PHP scripting language and is compatible with the PHP version required by Grav. Although Grav itself requires little disk space, sufficient storage space is needed for content, images, and other files. Since Grav is known for its speed, hosting services with fast loading times and good server resources are preferable. Additionally, features like SSL certificates, regular backups, malware protection, and firewalls are crucial for website security. Hosting providers that offer one-click installations and easy maintenance options make setting up and maintaining a Grav website easier.
What requirements does Grav have for web hosting?
Grav has specific requirements for web hosting to ensure effective and smooth operation. These requirements include:
Technical Requirements | for Grav 1.7 |
---|---|
PHP Version | PHP 7.3.6 |
Web Server | Apache, NGINX, IIS, LiteSpeed, Lightly, etc. |
Required Apache Modules | mod_rewrite, mod_ssl, mod_mpm_itk_module |
Required PHP Modules | curl, ctype, dom, gd, json, mbstring, openssl, session, simplexml, xml, zip |
Detailed information on the technical requirements for the latest version can be found directly from the developer at: https://learn.getgrav.org/17/basics/requirements
Webmasters looking to publish their web content using Grav can explore suitable providers in our Grav hosting provider comparison.
Articles related to this comparison
WordPress vs. Joomla
The stage is set for the duel: WordPress vs. Joomla.
TYPO3 vs. Wordpress vs. Joomla CMS compared
CMS and Hosting Requirements: TYPO3 vs. Wordpress vs. Joomla compared