CaptchaCore: 25 % Rabatt auf DSGVO-konformen Bot-Schutz – exklusiv für HOSTtest25 % Rabatt auf CaptchaCore – exklusiv für HOSTtest-Nutzer
CaptchaCor...
CaptchaCore: 25 % Rabatt auf DSGVO-konformen Bot-Schutz – exklusiv für HOSTtest25 % Rabatt auf CaptchaCore – exklusiv für HOSTtest-Nutzer
CaptchaCor...
CaptchaCore: 25 % Rabatt auf DSGVO-konformen Bot-Schutz – exklusiv für HOSTtest25 % Rabatt auf CaptchaCore – exklusiv für HOSTtest-Nutzer
CaptchaCor...
* At hosttest, only a selection of providers can be found. Offers marked with an asterisk have additional conditions on the offer detail page. More information about our ranking and sorting details.
* All prices on this page are net prices and are subject to the applicable VAT.
* If you click on a recommendation with *, this supports our work. hosttest may then receive remuneration.
Didn't find the right one?
Now post an individual tender for free & without obligation and receive offers in the shortest possible time.
A modern website uses dynamic pages where a programming language retrieves content from a database like MariaDB, MySQL, or SQLite, converts it into an HTML document, and delivers it to the client through a web server like Apache, NGINX, Google Web Server, or Microsoft IIS. It is common to combine this with a PHP web hosting that integrates all components necessary for operating a website and provides the user with a suitable environment at a fixed price. When comparing, significant differences can be found among providers offering similar services.
Differences in PHP Web Hosting with MariaDB
For over a decade, MySQL has been the undisputed standard for relational databases in various environments ranging from PHP web hosting to logistics and library catalogs. Both databases were fundamentally developed by the same developer, Michael Widenius, who named the projects after his daughters - My and Maria. After more than ten years, he left the MySQL development team and founded the fork MariaDB. The main reason was his concern that the new owner, Oracle, might neglect or completely discontinue development in favor of its proprietary and paid database systems.
Due to its enhanced functionality and the guaranteed support for each version for at least five years, many Linux distributions quickly adopted MariaDB, including Arch, Fedora, Debian, its derivative Ubuntu, and even Oracle Linux offered by the owner of MySQL. This move was also followed by numerous major internet platforms, such as the Wikimedia Foundation (Wikipedia and other free content), Google, or Mozilla.
For the end user, initially there were no discernible differences between both database systems, with MariaDB integrating features early on that MySQL only offered to its users in the commercial and proprietary version. Migrating from the free version of MySQL to MariaDB is still generally possible in most cases, but may not be reversible in some cases - the reason simply lies in the extended syntax and additional structural elements. A detailed article on the differences between MySQL and MariaDB.
PHP Hosting with MariaDB: Pros and Cons Overview
For a simple database on a private website with a few hundred or thousand visitors per month, the choice between MySQL and MariaDB does not make a practical difference - both are largely compatible, use identical commands, and exhibit similar performance at small scale. However, differences become apparent on a more complex and abstract level:
Advantages:
Fast access and high performance
Based on the proven, relational MySQL database
Extended functionality in the base version
Open-source licensing and free usage
Very good and extensive documentation
Tools like phpMyAdmin available for management
Disadvantages:
Conversion to MySQL not always possible
Decreasing performance with very large datasets
Backup only possible through additional programs
Operation requires its own database server
Possible Alternatives to MariaDB
Compared to MySQL, MariaDB offers some advantages and is considered a standard due to its compatibility since many Linux distributions switched over. For a limited amount of data, other file-based formats like SQLite, which do not require a separate server daemon, are viable options. However, the performance of these variants decreases rapidly with growing data size due to the necessary accesses to the storage medium.